This
is really exciting time in America; watching the drama of the 2016
Presidential nomination process from a distance, I find the contests,
the debates, the arguments, the hustling and jostling on both sides of
the mainstream political aisle, most instructive, and intriguing. The
world’s most advanced democracy is proving once again that freedom is a
golden ideal and that anyone who seeks to lead it, must undergo a
rigorous test of leadership and courage. So far, the presidential
primaries have proven to be a sifting process, and after last Tuesday,
better known as Super Tuesday, many of the otherwise promising
candidates have dropped out of the race, leaving the field to just a few
survivors.
But
the prospects are clear: Senator Hillary Clinton seems a sure bet on
the Democratic side, with Senator Bernie Sanders still trailing behind.
The Republicans too may well end up with Donald Trump. The other
contenders: Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich may not succeed in
displacing Trump. And this in itself is a source of anxiety, to both
Americans and non-Americans alike. If the race gets down to a Hillary
Clinton vs Donald Trump scenario, we all have every reason to be
anxious. Suppose Trump wins and becomes America’s President?
Donald
Trump is a snarling insurgent and a nativist. He has said all the worse
things that should never be uttered by anyone seeking to lead a
responsible and diverse nation. His campaign has been marked by insults,
anger, put downs, bully tactics, rants and unapologetic immaturity. He
has not been able to articulate any coherent policy, but he has proved
to be very creative with populist histrionics. The list of Trumpisms is
so frighteningly long and embarrassing.
He recommends torture, and the
killing of families of terrorists. He has been endorsed by white
supremacists and he doesn’t quite seem to mind being labeled a racist.
He threatens violence and on one occasion, he almost punched a protester
in the face. He even got into an altercation with the Pope. He wants to
barricade the American South border, and build a wall to shut out
Mexico, because according to him, the Mexicans who cross the border into
America are “rapists.” And when that wall is built, he insists Mexico
must pick up the bill.
He doesn’t want Muslims inside America either, and he has dismissed Africans as unwanted and Nigerians as a problem. He says:
“We
need to get the Africans out. Not the blacks, the Africans. Especially
the Nigerians. They’re everywhere. I went for a rally in Alaska and met
just one African in the entire state. Where was he from? Nigeria! He’s
in Alaska taking our jobs. They’re in Houston taking our jobs. Why can’t
they stay in their own country? Why? I’ll tell you why. Because they
are corrupt. Their Governments are so corrupt, they rob the people blind
and bring it all here to spend. And their people run away and come down
here and take our jobs! We can’t have that! If I become president,
we’ll send them all home. We’ll build a wall at the Atlantic Shore. Then
maybe we’ll re-colonize them because obviously they did not learn a
damn thing from the British!”
This certainly
cannot be the temperament of a man who wants to be President. Indeed,
one of the most amazing things that has happened in the on-going process
is how a real estate and reality television celebrity, whose best
achievement is inheriting wealth, and turning around a family business,
more by instinct rather than any special technocratic ability, has ended
up, getting close to winning the Presidential nomination of the
Republican Party, with the frightening prospect of becoming President of
the United States on January 20, 2017.
The irony is that
everyone underestimated him. The media loved the headlines that he
offered with his many offensive remarks. He was regarded in many
quarters as a comical distraction, and a bubble that may soon burst.
There were pictures of his current wife, looking like a siren, with her
drop-dead gorgeous figure, and skimpy dressing that belongs more to
Hollywood rather than the White House. When Ted Cruz upstaged him in the
Iowa caucuses, there were sighs of relief,
but since then The Donald
has won every other primary, and on March 1, he won in seven of the 11
states. He is also likely to do better than his closest rivals in the
coming caucuses. Except a miracle happens, Donald Trump will be the
Republican flagbearer for the 2016 Presidential election. He has
received endorsements from key members of the Republican establishment,
something that was thought unlikely. In a recent debate, his fiercest
opponents even said they would support anyone that wins the GOP
nomination. It may be too late to “dump Trump.”
He did not invent
the votes that have put him comfortably in the lead. Republican voters
actually gave him the votes. While voters at party primaries do not
represent the general voting population, they are nevertheless saying
something about the American mind at this moment. Trump’s message of
xenophobia, protectionism and isolationism attracts large followership
and excites the conservative crowd. The average American is angry: angry
with his circumstances, with the establishment, with the lack of jobs,
with the economy, with politicians, with foreigners. Trump shapes all
that anger into rhetoric and he offers himself as an alternative. He is
not part of the establishment; he is against it. He calls himself a
“common sense conservative” but he is actually a political insurgent.
The only time he has said anything that sounded Presidential was after
Super Tuesday, when he departed from his usual script.
This has been taken
as a sign that perhaps Trump will re-brand, and that his style so far
has been nothing but populist gimmickry. As President of the United
States, he would probably change that style, recruit experts to handle
state affairs, and restrain himself. But can America afford to vote on
the basis of that possibility? Can America afford to gamble? Trump is
impulsive and non-conventional; there is no guarantee that his
Presidency will not trump America and embarrass the party of Abraham
Lincoln. The character of the leader affects nearly everything else.
It will be too much to believe that Donald Trump is merely acting, given
his surplus confidence.
Mrs. Hillary
Clinton is a better choice, but going into a general election, she would
have to deal with the division within the Democratic fold. Bernie
Sanders, her leading rival, has such a devoted grassroots followership
that has divided the Democrats into the pro- and anti-establishment
wings. Sanders has mobilized such a fanatical political base within the
party and on social media that does not trust Mrs Clinton. She has been
branded a friend of Wall Street and the status quo, whereas Sanders and
his supporters insist that the best way forward is to change how
Washington works, and they do not believe Mrs Clinton can do that.
Despite
her attempts to move a little to the left in recent times, the
insurgents running a “Bernie or Bust” campaign may move to the Trump
side during the general elections because they are convinced she is
play-acting, just to win the nomination. Bernie Sanders of Vermont is
admired for his progressive, liberal ideas. But again, just as in
Trump’s case, his mostly young supporters are motivated by anger and
insecurity. Sanders wants to redistribute wealth, checkmate Wall Street,
and revolutionize health care. The young and the angry are excited but
those ideas are not properly articulated in policy terms. And in any
case, will the American voter be willing to have as President a man who
says he is a “socialist?”
Mrs Clinton’s big
challenge is to play the role of a unifier and take steps to unite the
party, after winning the Democratic nomination. She will definitely
need that “Bernie or Bust” crowd. She struck the right chord when she spoke recently about love and unity, quoting the Scriptures.
“Love
never fails. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all
things, endures all things.” (I Corinthians 13),” she said.
“These
are words to live by, not only for ourselves, but also for our country.
I know it sometimes seems a little odd for someone running for
president in these days, in this time, to say we need more love and
kindness in America. But I’m telling you from the bottom of my heart we
do. We do.
“There
is no doubt in my mind that America’s best years can be ahead of us. We
have got to believe that. We’ve got to work for that. We have to stand
with each other. We have to hold each other up, lift each other up, move
together into the future that we will make.”
These
are wise, consolatory words. Mrs Clinton has her heart in the right
place and has both the experience and the maturity to lead America.
Senator, former Secretary of State, and 42nd First Lady of
the United States, more than 25 years in the limelight has exposed
Hillary Rodham Clinton to intense media scrutiny, creating what many
consider an image problem. But whatever that is, it can be surmounted. A
Presidential contest between her and Trump will amount to a choice
between love and hate,
between the sober and the outrageous, between the
respectable and the grossly self-contradictory. America needs to
encourage love and kindness within its borders and also stand with the
rest of the world. The angry American voter who feels under-represented,
alienated, jobless and unfulfilled, and who desperately wants to punish
the establishment, may be making a comment on mainstream politics,
orthodoxy and the performance of the Obama administration. But that
anger should not be turned against the rest of the world by putting a
xenophobe and closet dictator in the White House.
Democracy
is tricky; it sometimes ends up as a parody of itself. When the people
clamour for change, they can vote with their hearts, and prove
impervious to plain sight reason, and overlook likely pitfalls. We can
only hope that Donald Trump does not become the symbol of the change
that Americans are seeking. That would be sad indeed for the free world.


Are you a business man or woman? Do you need funds to start up your own business? Do you need loan to settle your debt or pay off your bills or start a nice business? Do you need funds to finance your project? We Offers guaranteed loan services of any amount and to any part of the world for (Individuals, Companies, Realtor and Corporate Bodies) at our superb interest rate of 3%. For application and more information send replies to the following E-mail address: standardonlineinvestment@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteThanks and look forward to your prompt reply.
Regards,
Muqse